MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405935254 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2024.3521389

Physics-Informed Deep Operator Network for 3-D Time-Domain Electromagnetic Modeling

2024· article· en· W4405935254 on OpenAlexaff
Shutong Qi, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperator (biology)PhysicsTime domainComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a modeling technique for realistic 3-D electromagnetic problems in the time domain, using a novel physics-informed deep operator network (PI-DON). The training of the PI-DON is executed in two stages. In the first stage, a neural operator is trained to approximate the curl operator in Maxwell’s equations. In the second stage, the neural curl operator is deployed with problem-specific settings to model electromagnetic fields through an unsupervised training approach, utilizing a physics-informed loss function. This unsupervised training eliminates the need to generate ground-truth data and reduces the volume of training data required, making PI-DON more efficient than traditional deep neural networks. As an electromagnetic solver, PI-DON demonstrates competitive efficiency compared to finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solvers for a single run, even when accounting for its training time. Moreover, PI-DON shows strong generalizability, allowing for accurate and efficient uncertainty quantification and design optimization of microwave geometries without additional training. We show the high accuracy, efficiency, and robust generalizability of the PI-DON solver through the modeling and uncertainty quantification of 3-D planar microwave circuits and a metasurface unit cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207