MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405937711 · doi:10.33002/jelp040302

Policy and Role of the Criminal Police in Combating Environmental Crimes

2024· article· en· W4405937711 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Myroslav Romaniuk, Serhii Kovalenko, Maryna Chernysh, Lina Tovpyha, Lidia Kupchenia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Law & Policy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaw enforcementThematic analysisCrime analysisEnforcementEnvironmental crimeAgency (philosophy)CriminologyPsychological interventionBusinessQualitative researchPolitical scienceEnvironmental resource managementPublic relationsEnvironmental planningGeographyLawPsychologySociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental crimes threaten ecosystems, public health, and global economic stability, necessitating enhanced law enforcement strategies. This study critically examines the role of the criminal police in combating these crimes, focusing on evaluating the effectiveness of police interventions and identifying key factors influencing success. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating a thematic analysis of investigative materials, a quantitative assessment of crime statistics, and qualitative interviews with law enforcement officers and environmental experts. Additionally, spatial analysis using Geographic Information Systems was utilized to identify crime hotspots. The study's findings reveal a clear negative correlation between enhanced policing efforts and environmental crime rates, with spatial analysis highlighting concentrated areas of illegal activity. Qualitative results indicate opportunities for refining enforcement strategies, particularly through technology integration and inter-agency collaboration. The study's contribution lies in its comprehensive approach, combining statistical, spatial, and qualitative data to assess the effectiveness of policing strategies. Future research should focus on long-term evaluations and cross-jurisdictional comparisons to optimize global enforcement practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Law & PolicySame topicWildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesFrench-language works237,207