MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405943998 · doi:10.1007/979-8-8688-1061-9_18

Reclaim Your Creative Content

2024· book-chapter· en· W4405943998 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Parra Pennefather

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Thinking · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContent (measure theory)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Once upon a time in ancient Greece, there was a clever man named Epimetheus. He had a sly neighbor who stole his prized rooster. Epimetheus, instead of confronting the thief directly, came up with a cunning plan. He invited the neighbor to a feast, and, as they ate, he casually mentioned that he had discovered a magical spring that turned anything it touched into gold. The neighbor, greedy as he was, begged to see it. Epimetheus agreed and led him to an old well, where he secretly threw in some gold coins. The neighbor, convinced of the well’s magic, hurriedly sold all his belongings and threw the money into the well. Epimetheus, having reclaimed his rooster and more, simply walked away, leaving the neighbor to wonder where his fortune had gone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0170.007
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3780.396

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.043 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesign ThinkingSame topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207