Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a small village, the villagers prided themselves on their collective intelligence. They believed that no single person could be wiser than the group. To prove this, they decided to find the wisest man in the village. They gathered everyone and posed the question: "How can we move the large boulder blocking the main road?" One man suggested using ropes, another proposed digging around it, and yet another thought they should push it with all their might. After much debate, they decided to act on all suggestions at once. The villagers tied ropes around the boulder, started digging around it, and pushed with all their might. Despite their efforts, the boulder didn't budge. They argued and blamed each other, forgetting their original purpose. Just then, a child passing by asked, "Why don’t you try pushing it from the other side?" Realizing their folly, the villagers laughed and followed the child's advice. The boulder moved easily, and the road was cleared. They learned that sometimes the simplest solution comes from the least expected place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it