MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405948632 · doi:10.3390/machines13010011

Advancements in Smart Nondestructive Evaluation of Industrial Machines: A Comprehensive Review of Computer Vision and AI Techniques for Infrastructure Maintenance

2024· review· en· W4405948632 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachines · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsComputer scienceEngineeringConstruction engineeringSystems engineeringEngineering management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrastructure maintenance is critical to ensuring public safety and the longevity of essential structures. Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) techniques allow for infrastructure inspection without causing damage. Computer vision has emerged as a powerful tool in this domain, providing automated, efficient, and accurate solutions for defect detection, structural monitoring, and real-time analysis. This review explores the current state of computer vision in NDE, discussing key techniques, applications across various infrastructure types, and the integration of deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), vision transformers (ViTs), and hybrid models. The review also highlights challenges, including data availability and scalability. It proposes future research directions, including real-time monitoring and the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with Internet of Things (IoT) devices for comprehensive inspections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it