MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405949996 · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2024.109167

Challenges associated with the recovery of Co– and As-bearing minerals from aged mine tailings

2024· article· en· W4405949996 on OpenAlexaffabout
Samuel Teillaud, Lucie Coudert, Yassine Ait-Khouia, Mostafa Benzaazoua, Marie Guittonny, Baptiste Laubie, Marie‐Odile Simonnot

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsBearing (navigation)Mining engineeringWaste managementMetallurgyEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringMaterials scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Gravity separation and flotation were used to recover Co– and As–bearing minerals. • Co and As recovery from aged mine tailings is challenging due to secondary minerals. • Knelson and Mozley table concentrated Co and As efficiently but had low recovery. • Flotation using KAX and hydroxamic acid is efficient in recovering Co and As. • Sonication pre-treatment slightly enhanced flotation performance. The global demand for cobalt (Co), essential for “clean” energy technologies, has raised interest in identifying secondary sources, including mine tailings. This study evaluates the potential of historic silver (Ag) mine tailings in Ontario, Canada, as a secondary Co source and for arsenic (As) mitigation, offering economic and environmental benefits. Physico–chemical and mineralogical characterization revealed promising Co (1 310 mg/kg) and As (5 245 mg/kg) contents in fine silty tailings (D 80 = 55 μm), with key Co-As-bearing minerals (e.g., safflorite, skutterudite, cobaltite, erythrite) exhibiting significant alteration and association with silicates (i.e., albite, quartz, chlorite). The complex mineralogy and fine particle size are challenging for conventional processing methods. Tests using gravity separation achieved limited Co and As recoveries (4.2% and 7.3%, respectively), despite effective preconcentration (x24.8 and x38, respectively). Flotation experiments, performed in Denver cell with xanthate and hydroxamic acid collectors, achieved concentration factors of 2.5 for Co (70% recovery) and 3.0 for As (80% recovery). Pre-treatment with sonication further enhanced flotation efficiency. Analysis of entrainment index and particle size distribution emphasized the role of hydroxamate in particle recovery. The study highlights the need for innovative processing strategies to overcome challenges posed by fine particle size, mineral alteration, and complex associations. However, Co grades comparable to global smelter concentrates were achieved, suggesting the potential for sustainable reprocessing of aged mine tailings. Future research should focus on optimizing reprocessing techniques to enhance resource efficiency and sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinerals EngineeringSame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207