MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405957417 · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2024.103146

Investment and financing of roadway digital infrastructure for automated driving

2025· article· en· W4405957417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Part B Methodological · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFinanceInvestment (military)Transport engineeringBusinessComputer scienceEngineeringPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connected automated vehicles (CAVs) are equipped with sensors, enabling them to scan and analyze their surrounding environment. This capability empowers CAVs to make informed and efficient decisions regarding their motion; however, the limited spatial range and resolution of these sensors present challenges for achieving full autonomy. Cooperative sensing through vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications offers an alternative approach to enrich CAVs’ environmental understanding. This study explores the optimal investment policy for vehicular connectivity and road-side sensor deployment under varying traffic flow conditions. It also extends the self-financing theorem to the sensor equipped roads and investigates whether an optimal toll can cover both the construction costs and the costs of equipping roads with sensing components. The stylized model of CAV mobility considers the interplay between stationary sensors installed road-side as a part of the infrastructure and mobile sensors of CAVs. Results indicate that under constrained budgets and low traffic flow, investing in infrastructure improvement is preferred. However, as traffic flow increases, prioritizing connectivity and data sharing among CAVs becomes more lucrative. Notably, in high traffic flow, a shift back to investing in stationary sensors may occur, depending on system settings. The findings provide insights into budget allocation to enhance CAV performance, advancing the development of efficient and safe automated driving systems. The analyses on the self-financing theorem also show that the optimal user tolls do not cover the cost of constructing digital infrastructure. However, if social planners consider the safety benefits of sensor equipped roads, the construction of digital infrastructure can be covered by the optimal user tolls. In addition, the revenue from optimal user tolls can cover the cost of equipping existing roads with sensors if their flow-capacity ratio is greater than a certain threshold. • We investigate optimal investment strategies in vehicular connectivity and road-side sensors. • For a given budget and low traffic flow, investing in roadside sensors is preferred. • For high traffic flows, investment should be allocated more to vehicular connectivity. • In high traffic flows, a shift back to investing in stationary sensors may occur depending on certain conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it