MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405963443 · doi:10.7755/mfr.81.3-4.7

Meta-population Modeling of Narwhals, Monodon monoceros, in East Canada and West Greenland

2019· article· en· W4405963443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lars Witting, Thomas Doniol‐Valcroze, Roderick C. Hobbs, Susanne Ditlevsen, Mads Peter Heide‐Jørgensen

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Fisheries Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPopulationDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narwhals, Monodon monoceros, in the Baffin Bay region of East Canada and West Greenland are aggregated into eight summer stocks, and they are hunted in 24 geographically and seasonally separated hunts. Several of the hunts target animals from different stocks, making sustainable management challenging. We develop a meta-population model to face the challenge. We use a catch allocation model to allocate the catches in the different hunts into historical time-series distributions for the total removals from each stock. Bayesian population dynamic modeling then analyzes the impacts of the 24 hunts on the eight stocks. The catch allocation, however, depends on the population dynamics. Thus, we integrate the allocation and population modeling in iterative runs until the estimated catch histories and population trajectories converge. This framework is useful for sustainability assessment and management practices. The allocation model assigns catches to stocks, and the population modeling estimates sustainability for each stock. When done in retrospect it judges the sustainability of current takes. Acting on these measures, managers can use forward projections to identify overall hunting patterns that secure sustainability for all narwhals in the Baffin Bay region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Fisheries ReviewSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207