MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405975138 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3523518

PRIDA-ME: A Privacy-Preserving, Interoperable and Decentralized Authentication Scheme for Metaverse Environment

2025· article· en· W4405975138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer securityMetaverseAuthentication (law)InteroperabilityCryptographyAvatarWorld Wide WebHuman–computer interactionVirtual reality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metaverse is a new virtual world that has the potential to significantly impact our interactions with digital content and with each other. It is a shared virtual environment where users can seamlessly and with immersive experiences create, interact, and enjoy digital assets. Nevertheless, the metaverse also poses fundamental challenges, particularly about security and privacy concerns, that require careful consideration. One of the most daunting aspects of securing the metaverse is authentication. Several solutions have been proposed, including deployment of blockchain technology and smart contracts, to address these authentication challenges. While these methods provide a secure and tamper-proof authentication mechanism, they fail to meet certain critical security and privacy requirements like interoperability and decentralization. This research proposes an enhanced privacy-preserving authentication scheme based on blockchain, elliptic curve cryptography, biohashing, and a physical unclonable function that guards against various attacks. The proposed scheme does not rely on a single central authority and consists of various phases, including user and avatar authentication, password change, and avatar generation phases. The proposed scheme underwent security assessment using the Burrows Abadi Needham (BAN) logic, ProVerif tool, and Scyther tool. The results demonstrate that it provides a better level of security against a wide range of attack vectors. The proposed scheme offers a swift and efficient authentication mechanism that adheres to the requirements of the metaverse environment, such as interoperability, decentralization, and privacy protection, and requires less computation cost as compared to state-of-the-art schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it