Extended Reality (XR) Codec Adaptation in 5G using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Attention Action Selection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extended Reality (XR) services will revolutionize applications over $5^{\text {th }}$ and $\mathbf{6}^{\text {th }}$ generation wireless networks by providing seamless virtual and augmented reality experiences. These applications impose significant challenges on network infrastructure, which can be addressed by machine learning algorithms due to their adaptability. This paper presents a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) solution for optimizing codec parameters of XR traffic, comparing it to the Adjust Packet Size (APS) algorithm. Our cooperative multi-agent system uses an Optimistic Mixture of Q-Values ($\mathbf{O Q M I X}$) approach for handling Cloud Gaming (CG), Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR) traffic. Enhancements include an attention mechanism and slate-Markov Decision Process (MDP) for improved action selection. Simulations show our solution outperforms APS with average gains of $30.1 \%, 15.6 \%, 16.5 \% 50.3 \%$ in XR index, jitter, delay, and Packet Loss Ratio (PLR), respectively. APS tends to increase throughput but also packet losses, whereas oQMIX reduces PLR, delay, and jitter while maintaining goodput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".