Supportive Education in Preventing Helminthiasis in Elementary School Children with Stunting in Amanuban Barat Sub-District, TTS District
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are a common helminthic disease that can have a devastating impact. The impact of this helminth infection is the occurrence of stunting nutrition problems in elementary school children. Therefore, school children need to be given supportive education to prevent helminthiasis and stunting independently. Methods: This study was conducted in 4 elementary schools in Amanuban Barat Subdistrict, South Central Timor Regency, in 2024. Type of quantitative research with a pseudo-experimental research design with the Supportive Education method, consisting of 2 groups, namely the experimental group and the control group. The research variables consisted of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. The sample size of the study was 200 elementary school children, consisting of 100 children in the experimental group and 100 children in the control group. The sampling technique used simple random sampling. The research instrument used a questionnaire to measure knowledge, attitudes and behavioural actions and analysed differences in knowledge, attitudes and actions in the treatment group before and after providing supportive education using paired T-test and Mann-Whitney Test. Results: The results of the Mann-Whitney statistical test of the difference in knowledge between the control group pretest and post-test p value 0.410 and the experimental group respondents (SE) pre - post-test p value 0.000 significant. the results of the paired T-test statistical test of the difference in attitude between the control pre test and post test p value 0.361 insignificant and the treatment group supportive education pre and post test p value 0.000 significant. The results of the Mann-Whitney statistical test of differences in behavioural actions of the control group pre test and post test p value 0.186 is not significant and the experimental group respondent supportive education post test p value 0.000 significant. Conclusion: There is an effect of supportive education on knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of preventive measures for helminthiasis infection in elementary school children with stunting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".