MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405987299 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109254

Surface water and flood-based agricultural systems: Mapping and modelling long-term variability in the Senegal river floodplain

2025· article· en· W4405987299 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Ogilvie, Cheickh Sadibou Fall, Ansoumana Bodian, Didier Martin, Laurent Bruckmann, Djiby Dia, Issa Lèye, Papa Ndiaye, Donissongou Dimitri Soro, Jean Homian Danumah, Jean‐Claude Bader, Jean-Christophe Poussin

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Water Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentrEau - Quebec Water Management Research Centre
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsFloodplainHydrology (agriculture)Term (time)Flood mythEnvironmental scienceSurface waterWater resource managementAgricultureGeographyGeologyEnvironmental engineeringCartographyArchaeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the alluvial plains of large rivers, annual flooding is essential for numerous ecosystem services, including flood-based agriculture, biodiversity and groundwater recharge . Remote sensing provides increased opportunities to monitor surface water dynamics across large floodplains that are currently poorly captured by local hydrological monitoring and modelling due to data scarcity and the flat, heterogeneous topography. Combining the advances in earth observations with hydrological modelling and extensive in situ fieldwork , this research seeks to improve our understanding of surface water dynamics and associated agricultural practices in the Senegal river floodplain. 2813 mosaics from Landsat , MODIS and Sentinel-2 earth observations are created to map and monitor surface water variations using a site specific MNDWI classification adapted to complex, wetland environments. Validated against ground truth data, the approach is upscaled using cloud computing across this 2250 km 2 floodplain over 1999–2022. Statistical regression models are then developed to estimate flooded and cultivated areas based on upstream flow values since 1950 and analyse trends and exceedance probabilities over time. Results reveal extreme interannual variations in peak flooded areas, ranging from 30,000 ha and 720,000 ha between 1950 and 2022, while annual water modules fluctuate between 210 and 1460 m 3 /s. After 1994, flooded areas show partial recovery, with 95th percentile reaching 89,000 ha during 1994–2022 compared to 37,000 ha in 1972–1993. Flood-based agricultural practices cover between 13,000 ha and 133,000 ha over the same period, highlighting the pronounced variability faced by local rural communities. Occurrence maps and predictive models for annual flooded and cultivated areas based on upstream flows can support early warning tools, helping to prepare for extreme floods and droughts. These outputs are crucial to assess the impact of future climatic and anthropic changes in the region, including planned dams, on the amplitude of annual floods and their associated environmental benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Water ManagementSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207