Renting Servers for Multi-Parameter Jobs in the Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the Renting Servers in the Cloud problem (RSiC) in multiple dimensions. In this problem, a sequence of multi-parameter jobs must be scheduled on servers that can be rented on-demand. Each job has an arrival time, a finishing time, and a multi-dimensional size vector that specifies its resource demands. Each server has a multi-dimensional capacity and jobs can be scheduled on a server as long as in each dimension the sum of sizes of jobs does not exceed the capacity of the server in that dimension. The goal is to minimize the total rental time of servers needed to process the job sequence. AF algorithms do not rent new servers to accommodate a job unless they have to. We introduce a sub-family of AF algorithms called monotone AF algorithms. We show this family have a tight competitive ratio of $Theta(d mu)$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem and $mu$ is the ratio between the maximum and minimum duration of jobs in the input sequence. We also show that upper bounds for the RSiC problem obey the direct-sum property with respect to dimension $d$, that is we show how to transform $1$-dimensional algorithms for RSiC to work in the $d$-dimensional setting with competitive ratio scaling by a factor of $d$. As a corollary, we obtain an $O(d\sqrt{log mu})$ upper bound for $d$-dimensional clairvoyant RSiC. We also establish a lower bound of $\widetilde{Omega}(d mu)$ for both deterministic and randomized algorithms for $d$-dimensional non-clairvoyant RSiC, under the assumption that $mu \le log d - 2$. Lastly, we propose a natural greedy algorithm called Greedy. Greedy, is a clairvoyant algorithm belongs to the monotone AF family, achieves a competitive ratio of $Theta(d mu)$. Our experimental results indicate that Greedy performs better or matches all other existing algorithms, for almost all the settings of arrival rates and values of mu and $d$ that we implemented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".