MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405998776 · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00407-7

Vanzacaftor–tezacaftor–deutivacaftor for children aged 6–11 years with cystic fibrosis (RIDGELINE Trial VX21-121-105): an analysis from a single-arm, phase 3 trial

2025· article· en· W4405998776 on OpenAlexafffund
Jordana E. Hoppe, Ajay S. Kasi, Jessica E. Pittman, Renée Jensen, L. Thia, Philip Robinson, Pornchai Tirakitsoontorn, Bonnie W. Ramsey, Marcus Mall, Jennifer L. Taylor‐Cousar, Edward F. McKone, Elizabeth Tullis, Danieli B. Salinas, Jesse Zhu, Yangbiao Chen, Violeta Rodriguez‐Romero, Patrick R. Sosnay, Gwyneth Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftVertex PharmaceuticalsCystic Fibrosis TrustDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchInsmedAstraZenecaUK Research and InnovationCystic Fibrosis Foundation TherapeuticsGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthCystic Fibrosis CanadaEuropean Respiratory SocietyAmerican Thoracic Society
KeywordsIvacaftorMedicineTolerabilityCystic fibrosisClinical endpointClinical trialAdverse effectInternal medicineCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In phase 2 trials in people with cystic fibrosis aged 18 years and older, vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor has been shown to be a safe and effective, once-daily cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator. Restoring normal CFTR function early in life has the potential to prevent manifestations of cystic fibrosis. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in children with cystic fibrosis aged 6-11 years. METHODS: % predicted of 60% or higher, and stable cystic fibrosis as determined by investigators. Before study treatment, participants were either on stable elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for at least 28 days before screening or received the combination for a 4-week run-in period. Participants then received vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (<40 kg bodyweight: vanzacaftor 12 mg, tezacaftor 60 mg, and deutivacaftor 150 mg orally as three fixed-dose combination tablets once daily; ≥40 kg bodyweight: vanzacaftor 20 mg, tezacaftor 100 mg, and deutivacaftor 250 mg orally as two fixed-dose combination tablets once daily (manufactured by Patheon Pharmaceuticals, Cincinnati, OH, USA) from day 1 for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, as measured by adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory values, electrocardiograms, and pulse oximetry. Endpoints were analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05422222, and evaluation of the 6-11-year-old cohort is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 6 and May 18, 2023, 83 children were screened, of whom five were not eligible, and 78 children aged 6-11 years received at least one dose of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor. Median age was 9·3 years (IQR 7·6-10·4), 34 (44%) of 78 participants were female, 44 (56%) were male, 71 (91%) were White, one (1%) was Black or African American, and one (1%) was of multiple races. The analysis for these data was completed on Dec 15, 2023. Median exposure of participants to vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor was 168 days (IQR 166-170). 75 (96%) of 78 participants had adverse events, all of which were mild or moderate; the most common events were generally consistent with cystic fibrosis manifestations, including, cough (36 [46%]), pyrexia (16 [21%]), headache (14 [18%]), infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis (13 [17%]), and oropharyngeal pain (13 [17%]). Serious adverse events occurred in six (8%) participants (two had infective pulmonary exacerbation, one of whom also had failure to thrive; one participant each had adenovirus infection, constipation, pulmonary function test decreased, and cough), and one (1%) participant discontinued due to adverse events of cough and fatigue that were considered possibly related to study drug. INTERPRETATION: % predicted from elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor baseline with further improved CFTR function. Improvements in CFTR function compared with baseline elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor values demonstrate the potential opportunity to restore normal physiology early and prevent development or progression of cystic fibrosis. Nearly all participants had sweat chloride below the diagnostic threshold for cytstic fibrosis (<60 mmol/L) and more than half had normal levels (<30 mmol/L). Additional long-term data in children with cystic fibrosis are being collected in an open-label extension study to demonstrate clinical benefits and safety. These findings will inform health-care providers and people with cystic fibrosis regarding the benefits of early initiation of CFTR modulators. FUNDING: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Respiratory MedicineSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207