Behavioral Intentions in Cashless: The Role of Green Finance Perception in the Vietnamese Market
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present research investigates consumers' behavioral intention towards cashless modes of payment in Vietnam with mediating factors such as green finance perception. Based on the theory of planned behavior and perceived benefits the study seeks to compare functional, economic, psychological and social benefits as factors influencing attitude, self-control beliefs and subjective norms, towards acceptance of cashless systems. The present study engaged a survey of 355 respondents and offered a measurement model and analysis results of the relation between the variables following the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that attitude and behavioral control are the predictors of intention with significant influence, while green finance moderates the relationship between attitude and subjective norms to intention, but not behavioral control. Such findings suggest that publicizing the utilitarian and environmental advantages of cashless payment should be pursued. Finally, the study recommends that there should be specific marketing promotion to ensure that more people embrace green finance with the investigations being extended across people of different categories to increase efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".