MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406001729 · doi:10.59247/csol.v2i3.165

Hybrid Adaptive Backstepping Sliding Mode Controller of Permanent Magnet Linear Synchronous Motors

2024· article· en· W4406001729 on OpenAlexaff
Yahiaoui Maamar, Hashim Alnami, I. M. Elzein, Afif Benameur, Brahimi Brahim, Mohamed Horch, Mohamed Metwally Mahmoud

Bibliographic record

VenueControl Systems and Optimization Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsCollege Ahuntsic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)BacksteppingPermanent magnet synchronous motorPermanent magnet synchronous generatorMagnetMode (computer interface)Linear motorController (irrigation)Synchronous motorComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringPhysicsNonlinear systemAdaptive controlElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper tackles the tracking position control dilemma of permanent magnet linear synchronous motors with parameter uncertainties and load force disturbance. Adaptive nonlinear backstepping control augmented with sliding mode control (SMC) is proposed to solve the problem of load force distribution. The backstepping is a recursive control technique where its stability is ensured at each step. However, its sensitivity to uncertainties, disturbances, and electromagnetic noise leads to unwanted performances. SMC is a well-known nonlinear robust approach for uncertain dynamical systems and reduces its parametric adaptive laws. However, implementing this technique in real-time applications is stopped by its main shortcoming, the undesirable chattering phenomenon. The saturation function is used to reduce the chattering phenomenon. The incorporation of these approaches is a promising solution to provide a suitable position tracking of PMLSM in the presence of parameter uncertainties and load force disturbance. The simulation tests have been performed on the PMLSM system to prove the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed controller law. The results highlighted satisfactory position tracking performance in transient conditions and steady-state and under different load force disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueControl Systems and Optimization LettersSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207