MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Ab Initio</i> Strategy for Taming the Nuclear-Structure Dependence of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> Extractions: The <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> Superallowed Transition

2025· article· lv· W4406002204 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Gennari, M. Drissi, Mikhail Gorchtein, P. Navrátil, Chien-Yeah Seng

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsAb initioQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the first ab initio calculation of the nuclear-structure-dependent radiative correction ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{\mathrm{NS}}$ to the $^{10}\mathrm{C}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}^{10}\mathrm{B}$ superallowed transition, computed with the no-core shell model and chiral effective field theory. We obtain ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{\mathrm{NS}}=\ensuremath{-}0.422(29{)}_{\mathrm{nuc}}(12{)}_{n,\mathrm{el}}$ with a 1.6-times reduction in the total uncertainty when compared to the current literature estimate based on the shell model and Fermi gas picture. This Letter paves the way for a precise determination of ${V}_{ud}$ from superallowed beta decays within a systematically improvable framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.010
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0120.009
Research integrity0.0080.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6570.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207