MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406018838 · doi:10.7764/ric.00128.21

The potential of using chilean biomass to develop insulating biocomposite material

2024· article· en· W4406018838 on OpenAlexaff
Authors Alejandro Ignacio Rios Jaqui, Martin Noël, Marcelo González

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Ingeniería de Construcción · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersAgencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
KeywordsBiocompositeGreenhouse gasCarbon footprintHuskBiomass (ecology)Global-warming potentialEmbodied energyEnvironmental scienceRenewable energyGlobal warmingStrawFossil fuelClimate change mitigationAgricultureWaste managementMaterials scienceClimate changeEngineeringComposite materialAgronomyEcologyComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly CO2, has significantly contributed to global warming, with the residential and commercial building sectors playing a key role. Improving building energy efficiency through enhanced insulation is a crucial strategy for reducing CO2 emissions. However, conventional insulation materials have a high embodied carbon footprint, which limits their effectiveness in mitigating climate change. Biocomposites have emerged as an eco-friendly alternative to conventional materials. Countries like Chile, with their abundant agricultural fibers, show significant potential for fabricating biocomposites. This paper identifies the most produced fibers in Chile, including eucalyptus bark, wheat straw, rice husk, corn stalks, and walnut shells, and explores their potential use in the creation of sustainable biocomposite insulation materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Ingeniería de ConstrucciónSame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207