MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406021993 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55972-3_18

Sub-Ependymal Pseudocysts and Lenticulostriate Vasculopathy

2024· book-chapter· en· W4406021993 on OpenAlexaff
Frances M. Cowan, Lara M. Leijser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological Complications and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGenesis Research Trust
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Small sub-ependymal pseudocysts, usually located around or in the walls of the anterior horns of the lateral ventricles or in the caudo-thalamic notches, and linear echodensities, usually located in the basal ganglia (lenticulostriate vasculopathy [LSV]), are common findings on cranial ultrasound scans in newborn infants. The findings can give rise to considerable alarm, especially to parents. However, they are usually benign and very rarely cause problems. This is particularly so when they are isolated and found on screening ultrasound scans in infants without neurological symptoms, though testing for cytomegalovirus should be considered. But sub-ependymal pseudocysts, especially if more extensive and with LSV, can, however, be clues to underlying and serious diagnoses, especially in symptomatic infants. Awareness of the conditions in which these findings may occur can lead to early focused investigation as they are usually present on the admission scan. It is also important not to mistake the cysts for other pathology such as cystic white matter injury, porencephalic cysts, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage. This chapter is a guide to the appearance and known associations of sub-ependymal pseudocysts and LSV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeurological Complications and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207