MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406023593 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13010076

Cultural Determinants of Body Image: What About the Menopausal Transition?

2025· review· en· W4406023593 on OpenAlexaff
Coralie Vincent, Alixe Ménard, Isabelle Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsInstitut du Savoir MontfortUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialSociocultural evolutionPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyVulnerability (computing)Social psychologySociologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Body image is an important aspect of psychological well-being that is influenced by several biological and psychosocial risk factors. Cultural determinants of body image include the patterns of shared beliefs, values, practices, and social norms within a group that can act as a lens through which a person perceives, compares, and evaluates their body. Women tend to experience higher rates of body dissatisfaction than men, with reproductive milestones such as puberty, pregnancy, and postpartum being windows of vulnerability for body image concerns. The menopausal transition is another reproductive stage of women's lives that involves major physical changes, psychological challenges, and social pressures that can impact body image negatively. However, the literature on the influence of cultural determinants on the body image of menopausal women is limited. Therefore, this perspective review paper aims to discuss the potential role of cultural determinants in influencing body image satisfaction in women undergoing the menopausal transition. To this end, the relationships between different cultural perspectives and body image around the world are first discussed. Sociocultural influences on body image throughout women's lifespan and reproductive stages are then presented. Finally, cultural perspectives on menopause and aging and their potential influence on the body image of menopausal women are explored. This paper underscores the importance of considering culture and sociocultural factors when studying body image and highlights the need for further research on the cultural determinants of body image during the menopausal transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207