MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406026949 · doi:10.1503/cjs.000124

Rurality predisposes departure from gold-standard care, leading to delayed or accelerated access to surgery: insights from a scoping review

2025· review· en· W4406026949 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alisha Ebrahim, Sarthak Sinha, Ifeoluwa Adedipe, Madison Amyotte, Lucy Yang, Omar Elsewify, Sukhmeet S. Sachal, Frankie O. G. Fraulin, Vincent Gabriel, Grace Perez, Aaron Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of CalgaryWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuralityMedicineSocioeconomic statusEthnic groupPsychological interventionMEDLINEPopulationHealth careGuidelineFamily medicineRural areaGerontologyNursingEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Because tertiary centres are generally situated at urban sites, it is unclear whether patients in rural areas have the same access to surgical services that patients in urban areas do. We sought to map the North American evidence landscape of how rurality affects access to medically indicated surgeries and identify system-, patient-, and provider-level barriers that preclude urban-comparable care. METHODS: We carried out a systematic search adhering to PRISMA for Scoping Reviews methodology across PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, encompassing literature from the last 26 years (January 2023). Search terms included "rural population," "health care access," "surgical procedures," and "health disparities." We synthesized our findings using a narrative approach. RESULTS: Of 13 897 identified studies, we included 71 publications, spanning a wide spectrum of surgical disciplines. Of these, 83% reported diminished and 17% reported accelerated access to surgery, and 30% reported an interaction between rurality with other social determinants of health, particularly age, sex and gender, and race and ethnicity. Of the studies that reported diminished access, top cited reasons included primary and specialist provider density, differences in patients' socioeconomic profiles, and provision of comparable counselling during surgical decisionmaking. Strikingly, a key driver of enhanced surgical access was an absence of specialized medical interventions leading to an overreliance on surgical alternatives. CONCLUSION: Whether surgical access was diminished or accelerated, the net impact of rurality was a deviation from guideline-concordant care. A key implication of these findings is that reliance on surgical wait times alone can skew perception of surgical access, advocating for adoption of integrated quality-of-care metrics that better reflect access to comprehensive medical and surgical treatment programs. CONTEXTE: Étant donné que les centres de soins tertiaires se trouvent généralement en milieu urbain, on peut se demander si l'accès aux services chirurgicaux est le même en région rurale qu'en milieu urbain. Nous avons voulu cartographier, preuve à l'appui, l'impact de la ruralité sur l'accès à des chirurgies médicalement indiquées en Amérique du Nord et identifier les obstacles, propres au système, à la patientèle et aux équipes soignantes, qui nuisent à la prestation des soins équivalents à ceux des milieux urbains. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une interrogation systématique (conforme à la Norme de réalisation de revue systématique de la littérature PRISMA) des bases de données PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus et Web of Science regroupant la littérature des 26 dernières années (janvier 2023). Les mots clés de langue anglaise utilisés incluaient : « rural population », « health care access », « surgical procedures » et « health disparities ». Nous avons synthétisé nos observations au moyen d'une approche narrative. RÉSULTATS: Des 13 897 études recensées, nous avons retenu 71 publications abordant un vaste éventail de disciplines chirurgicales. Parmi ces publications, 83 % faisaient état d'un accès diminué, 17 % d'un accès plus rapide à la chirurgie, et 30 % d'un lien entre la ruralité et d'autres déterminants sociaux de la santé, notamment l'âge, le sexe et le genre, ainsi que la race et l'ethnicité. Selon les études ayant fait état d'un accès diminué, les principales raisons incluaient la densité des effectifs en médecine primaire et de spécialité, les différences de profils socioéconomiques de la patientèle et l'offre d'un counselling comparable lors du processus décisionnel concernant la chirurgie. À noter, l'un des principaux facteurs d'amélioration de l'accès aux soins chirurgicaux était l'absence d'interventions médicales spécialisées associées à une dépendance indue à l'endroit des solutions chirurgicales. CONCLUSION: Que l'accès à la chirurgie ait été diminué ou accéléré, l'impact net de la ruralité a pris la forme d'un écart par rapport aux soins préconisés par les lignes directrices. Ces observations indiquent principalement que la dépendance à l'égard des temps d'attente en chirurgie seule peut fausser la perception quant à l'accès aux soins chirurgicaux, ce qui milite en faveur de l'adoption de paramètres de qualité de soins intégrés qui reflèteraient plus fidèlement l'accès à des programmes de traitements médicaux et chirurgicaux complets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.247
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207