MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406030177 · doi:10.1002/alz.092052

Cognitive and behavioral decline predicted by perimenopausal symptoms: A CAN‐PROTECT study

2024· article· en· W4406030177 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jasper F. E. Crockford, Dylan X. Guan, Gillian Einstein, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoodMenopauseMedicineDementiaCognitionCognitive declineClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Menopause has been associated with greater dementia risk. We investigated the relationship between the presence of specific symptoms experienced during menopause (i.e., perimenopausal symptoms) and later-life emergence of cognitive and behavioral symptoms that are linked to elevated dementia risk. METHOD: Participant data were from the Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging (CAN-PROTECT) study. The sample for this analysis comprised 896 post-menopausal participants, who recalled the presence or absence of 11 perimenopausal symptoms. Symptoms were categorized as vasomotor, weight changes, vaginal dryness, irregular periods, sleep problems, mood changes, brain fog, and other unnamed symptoms. Currently experienced subjective cognitive symptoms were measured with the Everyday Cognition (ECog-II) scale. Emergent and persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms were measured with the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C). Higher scores reflected greater severity on both measures. A negative binomial regression examined the association between perimenopausal symptoms and cognitive function. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression examined the association between perimenopausal symptoms and MBI symptoms. All models adjusted for age of menopausal onset, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), menopause type (i.e., spontaneous, or due to medical reasons), age, and years of education. RESULT: Symptoms of brain fog, weight changes, and mood changes were associated with poorer current ECog-II score (b = 74.8, 95%CI [47.2, 108.0], p<.001; b = 24.4, 95%CI [8.9, 42.2], p = .001; b = 36.2, 95%CI [17.3, 58.3], p<.001, respectively). Comparatively, use of estrogen and non-estrogen-based MHT during menopause was not significantly associated with current ECog-II scores (b = -11.0,95%CI[-25.3, 6.5], p = .2; b = 16.9, 95%CI[-10.9, 56.1], p = .3, respectively). Weight and mood symptoms of perimenopause were significantly associated with poorer current MBI-C score (b = 24.4,95%CI[2.4,51.1], p = .03; b = 68.4%,95%CI[36.3,108.1], p<.001, respectively). MBI-C scores differed based on type of MHT used. Estrogen-based MHT was associated with a statistically significant 26.9% lower MBI-C score (95%CI[-43.3, -5.7], p = .02), while score did not differ significantly with non-estrogen-based MHT (b = -19.1,95%CI[-44.6, 18.1], p = .3). CONCLUSION: The experience of brain fog, weight changes, and mood changes during perimenopause may predict greater risk for cognitive and behavioral changes later on. Use of estrogen-based MHT may mitigate the relationship between perimenopause symptoms and MBI symptoms. However, longitudinal data are required to explore mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments→French-language works237,207→