MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406036680 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.1184

Instability of falling films of discontinuously shear-thickening fluid

2025· article· en· W4406036680 on OpenAlexaff
Neil J. Balmforth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsFalling (accident)InstabilityDilatantMechanicsMaterials scienceShear (geology)Composite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aqueous suspensions of cornstarch abruptly increase their viscosity on raising either shear rate or stress, and display the formation of large-amplitude waves when flowing down inclined channels. The two features have been recently connected using constitutive models designed to describe discontinuous shear thickening. By including time-dependent relaxation and spatial diffusion of the frictional contact density responsible for shear thickening, an analysis of steady sheet flow and its linear stability is presented. The inclusion of such effects is motivated by the need to avoid an ill-posed mathematical problem in thin-film theory and the resulting failure to select any preferred wavelength for unstable linear waves. Relaxation, in particular, eliminates an ultraviolet catastrophe in the spectrum of unstable waves and furnishes a preferred wavelength at which growth is maximized. The nonlinear dynamics of the unstable waves is briefly explored. It is found that the linear instability saturates once disturbances reach finite amplitude, creating steadily propagating nonlinear waves. These waves take the form of a series of steep, shear-thickened steps that translate relatively slowly in comparison with the mean flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207