MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Black History Month 2022—Celebrating the Contributions of Black Nurses in Health Care</i>

2023· article· en· W4406047558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing History Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack womenBlack historyHealth careHistoryGender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black History Month 2022—Celebrating Contributions of Black Nurses in Health Care is part of a virtual and curated display that encourages the participant to learn about Black nurses in history, to take a closer look at the significant contributions of Black nurses in Canada, and to celebrate Black nurses across the world who have paved the way to better health care. Co-created by Dr. Lydia Wytenbroek, doctoral student Ismalia De Sousa, and five BSN students, and with the support of the Consortium for Nursing History Inquiry in the UBC-V, the purpose of this flipbook is to share knowledge in a manner that engages the viewer and motivates them to work toward ending racism and other forms of oppression within health and educational systems. The flipbook encourages self-reflection on how historical events and the professionalization of nursing have contributed to current health and social inequities through an easy-to-read, non-biased, visual format. The photographs and copy tell a story of immigration, public health, social reform, and progress in professional nursing.The flipbook is organized in a way that tells the story of ten Black nurses from Canada and other parts of the globe between 1805 and the late 1960s. Interspersed between photos and content related to the background of each nurse are slides with questions that encourage the viewer to consider various ideas such as how racism, segregation, and discrimination affected the nursing profession. Following each question, the viewer will find answers to the question that are intended to stimulate further thought and discussion. Some of the nurses in the flipbook will be familiar to those who have knowledge of nursing history. Others will be less well known. A unifying theme for many of the nurses is that each was known as the first Black nurse to complete various professional milestones. Examples include Mary Mahoney, the first Black registered nurse in the United States, and Cecilia Antyi Makiwane, the first Black South African to graduate from nursing school in 1908. Others are less well known, yet each nurse made a significant contribution to the profession and to the improvement of health care outcomes in their countries.Interspersed throughout the flipbook are archival photos that are visually interesting and provide data to support the stories of each nurse. Documentation of archival newspaper articles, transcripts, birth records, and census data are found throughout. One of the most interesting slides in the flipbook contains census data and a report by Jessie Sleet Scales, a Black Canadian nurse who practiced nursing in the United States. In the report Scales provides a comprehensive list of her duties as a district nurse in New York City. She notes that during October and November, she visited forty-six Black families, and made 156 house calls for illnesses that included consumption, chicken pox, cancer, and diphtheria. She also applied poultices, provided dressing changes, washed and dressed newborn babies, and cared for mothers. The addition of archival data throughout strengthens the overall narrative and provides a depth of understanding that increases viewer interest and engagement.The overarching theme of the flipbook is that racism is a structural determinant of health. This idea is in part attributed by the authors to noted educator and civil rights activist, W. E. B. DuBois, who identified, as early as 1906, the idea that multifactorial social, political, and economic structures explain health inequities. The flipbook examines various examples of racism in Canada as well as other countries to provide a compelling argument supporting these ideas. A comprehensive bibliography is found at the end of the flipbook with links to other websites that encourage the viewer to delve deeper into the subject.The flipbook is easy to navigate, visually interesting, and engaging to the viewer. The questions asked throughout stimulate additional questions and encourage the reader to consider how they can get involved and personally work to eliminate racism in health care. Guiding questions at the end encourage the viewer to reflect, for example, on why Florence Nightingale is considered the pioneer of modern nursing in spite of the examples of Black and indigenous nurses who clearly contributed significantly to professional progress. It is a timely, relevant, easy-to-read resource that students, novice historians, and anyone interested in nursing history will enjoy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it