The role of clusterin and the variant rs11136000_T throughout the spectrum of Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clusterin is a major cholesterol transporter in the central nervous system (CNS) and different SNPs in the CLU gene have been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. The rs11136000_T variant in the CLU gene has been shown to decrease the risk of AD. In this work, we investigate the role of the CLU rs11136000_T protective variant and of the clusterin protein throughout different phases of the AD spectrum. METHOD: Levels of clusterin, Tau, phospho(181) Tau (p-tau), and Aß were measured using ELISA and synaptic proteins were measured using immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectroscopy in the CSF of cognitively unimpaired individuals. Flortaucipir PET was used to measure tau deposition and 18F-NAV4694 PET was used to measure amyloid burden in the same subjects. ELISA was used to measure clusterin levels and RT-PCR was used to measure mRNA levels in cortical areas of autopsied-confirmed controls and AD subjects. Genotype was performed using Illumina Infinium Omni2.5M-8 microarray. RESULT: There was no effect of the protective genotype on the levels of PET biomarkers, CSF biomarkers or synaptic proteins in cognitively unimpaired individuals. CSF clusterin levels were positively associated with Aß (p = 0.021), total-tau (p<0.001), p-tau (p<0.001), synaptotagmin (p<0.001), SNAP 25 (p = 00006), GAP 43 (p = 0.00055) and neurogranin (p = 0.0086) in the CSF and with amyloid deposition in the hippocampus (p = 0.018) and tau retention in the entorhinal cortex (p = 0.0082) and temporal pole (p = 0.0124) in cognitively unimpaired individuals at high risk for AD. Clusterin is increased in the brain of individuals who are homozygous for the CLU_T variant (p = 0.04) and in AD patients compared to age-matched controls (p = 0.024). mRNA levels are increased in individuals homozygous for the CLU_T variant (p = 0.003), but there are no significant differences in AD patients compared to controls (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our work shows significant correlation between CSF clusterin and the main AD biomarkers (PET and CSF) and synaptic proteins before disease onset, in subjects at high risk for the disease. In the later stage of the disease, clusterin protein and CLU mRNA levels are increased as a function of genotype and disease status, suggesting that CLU may play a protective role by increases in gene expression in the CNS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".