MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406051174 · doi:10.1002/alz.092616

Manifold Component Analysis: a novel technique to spatially profile tau tangles across Alzheimer’s disease stages

2024· article· en· W4406051174 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gleb Bezgin, Tharick A. Pascoal, Joseph Therriault, Firoza Z Lussier, Stijn Servaes, Min Su Kang, Mélissa Savard, Cécile Tissot, Jenna Stevenson, Yi‐Ting Wang, Julie Ottoy, Nesrine Rahmouni, Jaime Fernández Arias, Arthur C. Macedo, Gassan Massarweh, Paolo Vitali, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Yasser Iturria‐Medina, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTangleCartographyAlzheimer's diseaseNeurosciencePsychologyPathologyMedicineMathematicsGeographyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Intracellular accumulation of tau tangles in the brain is one of the most prominent manifestations of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Progression thereof across the AD stages has specific temporal and spatial patterns, wherein time is informative of space and vice versa. Here we introduce a novel method, Manifold Component Analysis (MCA), to represent tangle accumulation in 2D, reflecting the spatial aspect of tau propagation stages to further relate it to the temporal aspect thereof. METHOD: MCA represents a neuroinformatics technique serving to smooth out transitions between neighbouring Braak stage regions (Fig. 1A) and thus creating "sub-stages" (Fig. 1B) which are subsequently used to sample neocortical (tau tangle) data and represent them in a continuous 2D graph with the spatially earliest sub-stage appearing in the leftmost, and the latest spatial sub-stage appearing on the right (Fig. 1C). This method was applied to 18F-MK-6240 tau PET tracer data from the TRIAD cohort (https://triad.tnl-mcgill.com/; N = 753; 123 AD, 170 MCI, 416 cognitively unimpaired). RESULT: We obtained MCA profiles of tau-PET for each subject in the cohort, and evaluated them across multiple visits (Fig. 1D; mean inter-visit interval 1.9 years), showing that the largest change (about 25%) occurs at stages 4 and 5. Partial correlations between sub-stages within the MCA profiles for each subject, and their corresponding neuropsychological assessment measurements showed unique spatial signatures for each specific cognitive test, generally favouring earlier stage correlations for memory, and later stage correlations for higher cognition (Fig. 1E); the covariates included age, sex, APOEe4 status and years of education. CONCLUSION: The MCA method proves useful as an intuitive lookup tool for tau tangle accumulation across the brain in AD. The obtained profiles help resolve correspondence between "space" and "time" contexts of the pathology spread, as well as the spatial aspect of the timeline of cognitive decline. As MCA is a subject-specific, easily applicable, fast and extensible technique, numerous new applications and extensions will follow, providing a necessary aid in staging, forecasting, and potentially treating AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→