MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406051683 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c04110

Luminescence of the Cs<sub>2</sub>ZrCl<sub>6</sub> under High Pressure

2025· article· en· W4406051683 on OpenAlexaff
Lev-Ivan Bulyk, Damian Włodarczyk, S.S. Nagorny, V. V. Nahorna, Pengli Wang, A. Suchocki

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsArthur B. McDonald-Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research InstituteQueen's University
FundersNarodowe Centrum Nauki
KeywordsChemistryPhotoluminescenceLuminescenceRaman spectroscopyHigh pressureInorganic compoundInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsEngineering physicsOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photoluminescence (PL) and Raman spectra of the Cs 2 ZrCl 6 crystal over a wide range of pressures were studied in this work for the first time. PL measurements were performed up to 10 GPa, while the Raman spectra were measured up to 20 GPa. The PL data revealed a linear blue shift of the emission maximum from about 2.5 eV at ambient pressure to 3.1 eV at 5 GPa and a strong intensity quenching. The indirect-to-direct bandgap transition at about 5 GPa, a phenomenon previously predicted only theoretically, was used to explain the strong quenching of the PL. This model was confirmed by fitting PL intensity data and analysis of the PL decay kinetics, which exhibited a shortening of the pulse decay time with the increasing pressure. Raman spectra confirmed the stability of Cs 2 ZrCl 6 up to 20 GPa and showed no evidence of pressure-induced structural phase transitions. An energetic scheme of excitonic levels, which takes into account the indirect-to-direct bandgap transition, was proposed to explain the rapid PL quenching with increasing pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207