Associations between structural brain changes and blood neurofilament light chain protein in treatment-resistant schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Around 30% of people with schizophrenia are refractory to antipsychotic treatment (treatment-resistant schizophrenia). Abnormal structural neuroimaging findings, in particular volume and thickness reductions, are often described in schizophrenia. Novel biomarkers of active brain pathology such as neurofilament light chain protein are now expected to improve current understanding of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. This study explored whether treatment-resistant schizophrenia individuals exhibit different associations between plasma neurofilament light chain protein levels and regional cortical thickness reductions compared with controls. METHODS: Plasma neurofilament light chain protein levels were measured, and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences were obtained and processed via FreeSurfer for each participant. General linear models adjusting for age and body mass index were estimated to determine whether the interaction between diagnostic group and plasma neurofilament light chain protein level predicted lower cortical thickness across frontotemporal structures and the insula. RESULTS: = 0.143) was associated with higher levels of plasma neurofilament light chain protein in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but not in healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The association between regional thickness reduction of the bilateral insula and left inferior temporal gyrus with plasma neurofilament light chain protein may reflect a neuroprogressive component to schizophrenia, which is not observed in the normal population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".