MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406071761 · doi:10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213652

Reducing geological uncertainty through coupled flow-geomechanics based surrogate models and rejection sampling of CO2 plume prediction

2025· article· en· W4406071761 on OpenAlex
Walid Ben Saleh, Bo Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoenergy Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomechanicsSampling (signal processing)PlumeFlow (mathematics)GeologyEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringMathematicsMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geological CO 2 storage (GCS) is vital in the worldwide pursuit of decarbonization. The scale-up of GCS projects, however, seems to fall short of expectations due to technical and operational difficulties in the deep geological formations. Robust reservoir characterization considering geological uncertainties due to limited data are perhaps the major bottlenecks of GCS large scale deployment. Here we present a workflow to quantify geological uncertainty by the assimilation of CO 2 plume maps acquired from 3D time-lapse seismic surveys. A data-driven proxy model is used to overcome computational constraints; therefore, enables the consideration of large-scale geological uncertainties by considering over 10,000 realizations for uncertainty quantifications. The proposed workflow is implemented for an operating geological CO 2 storage site in the deep saline aquifer of Williston Basin in Canada. The proxy model is not only capable of predicting CO 2 plume evolution with high accuracy, but also shows a notable computational time reduction. A considerable reduction in geological model uncertainty is achieved using the rejection sampling based on matching with assumed seismic interpretation. Among the 10,000 geological realizations, only 1066 realizations are accepted as posterior models with reduced geological uncertainty. The uncertainty quantification method proposed in this study effectively addresses geological model uncertainties based on available seismic survey and provides valuable insights into consideration of the geological uncertainty in CO 2 storage modeling and design of measurement, monitoring and verification (MMV) program for CO 2 storage projects. • Presents a workflow for using 4D seismic maps to quantify uncertainties in carbon storage geological models. • Integrates geomechanics into the simulation of CO 2 plume migration and pressure evolution. • Utilizes Deep learning algorithms to reduce computational burden arising from high resolution numerical simulations and uncertainty quantification workflows. • Presents a methodology for estimating plume size from numerical simulations. • Applies the proposed approach to an existing CO2 demonstration project in Western Canada • Demonstrates the importance selection appropriate CO2 saturation error for quantifying uncertainty in geological models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it