Effects of Soccer Training Programme on Physical Fitness Variables of School Level Tribal Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study was to find out the effects of specific soccer training programme on physical fitness variables namely agility, speed and endurance of school level tribal students. For the purpose of the study 60 tribal students were selected from Pandit Raghunath Murmu Abasik School, Nangla, Susunia, Bankura, West Bengal, India.The age of the subjects were 14 to 16 years as per school record. Sixty tribal students ware sub divided into two group’s i.e. experimental tribal (N=30) and control tribal (N=30). The training was given to the experimental group 4 day per week, par day one session for the period of the eight weeks. The content group was not provided any kind of specific soccer training. Pair T-Test was used to calculate the acquired data on agility, speed and endurance. Level of significance was set at 0.05 level. Result revealed that experimental group significantly improved their agility, speed and endurance performance after 8 weeks specific soccer training but the improvement of control group was not significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".