MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406076860 · doi:10.32660/jpk.v10i2.764

KRISIS SEPEREMPAT BAYA (QUARTER LIFE CRISIS) PADA MAHASISWA TINGKAT AKHIR KEPERAWATAN DI ITSK RS. Dr. SOEPRAOEN MALANG

2024· article· id· W4406076860 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dian Pitaloka Priasmoro, Nur Hamidah, Heny Nurmayunita

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Penelitian Keperawatan · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMethodologies in Health Research and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyHumanitiesArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quarter life crisis didefinisikan sebagai krisis pada emosional yang dihadapi oleh individu pada fase masa transisi dari masa remaja ke masa dewasa. Pada kondisi ini dengan istilah “twentysomething” mengapa di istilahkan “twentysomething” karena lebih banyak terjadi pada usia 20 tahunan. Gejala yang paling umum dirasakan adalah khawatir, cemas dan takut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa tingkat akhir prodi D III keperawatan ITSK RS dr Soepraoen Malang. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif. Populasinya adalah mahasiswa tingkat akhir prodi D III keperawatan ITSK RS dr Soepraoen Malang. Sampling yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling. Sampel berjumlah 30 orang. Variabel yang penelitian ini adalah gambaran quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa. Alat ukurnya menggunakan kuesioner.Data dikumpulkan dengan cara kuesioner, observasi dan dokumentasi. Penelitian dilakukan pada tanggal 5 Juni 2023. Dari hasil penelitian didapatkan hampir setengah responden mengalami quarter life crisis tingkat sedang sebanyak 15 responden dengan presentase 50% dan sebagian kecil mengalami quarter life crisis tingkat rendah sebanyak 6 responden dengan presentase 20%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Penelitian KeperawatanSame topicMethodologies in Health Research and PracticeFrench-language works237,207