MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406080415 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41606

Investigating variability of craft microbreweries spent grains for classification and incorporation into precision diet formulation through multivariate analyses

2025· article· en· W4406080415 on OpenAlexaff
Arturo Macias Franco, Ághata Elins Moreira da Silva, Tio Brody, Graham Holton, Macy L Rockwell, Nelcino Francisco de Paula, Leílson Rocha Bezerra, Mozart Alves Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureUniversity of Nevada, RenoU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsCraftMultivariate analysisStatisticsMathematicsGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alternative feedstuffs offer a cost-effective and sustainable option for livestock nutrition, playing a crucial role in niche market development. Brewer's spent grains (BSG), a byproduct of the expanding craft microbrewery industry, are a particularly promising feed source due to their availability and nutrient content. However, variability in BSG composition poses challenges for their effective incorporation into precision diet formulations. This study aimed to evaluate the variability in the nutrient composition of BSG from craft microbreweries and classify them for precision diet formulation using multivariate analyses. BSG samples from 29 craft microbreweries were collected and analysed for their nutrient composition using wet chemistry methods. Principal components analysed included crude protein (CP), ash and protein corrected neutral detergent fiber (apNDFom), non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC), and ether extract (EE). Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to identify the most significant nutrient variations, and hierarchical clustering of the principal components was used to group the samples into four distinct clusters. These clusters were further evaluated through in vitro fermentation tests, assessing gas production, digestibility, and fermentation characteristics. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. The principal components (energy (PC1) and protein (PC2) were the primary factors driving BSG variability. Hierarchical clustering produced four distinct feed clusters, which showed significant differences ( P < 0.05) in fermentation profiles, The apNDFom digestibility varied across clusters, with energy-dense feeds (higher and lower energy grains) demonstrating higher digestibility ( P < 0.05). The third cluster (CL3), characterized by low protein content, had significantly lower NH 3 -N concentrations after fermentation ( P < 0.05). Regarding gas and volatile fatty acids (VFA) production, clusters exhibited significant differences ( P < 0.05) compared to an alfalfa standard, highlighting the diverse fermentation characteristics of BSG. The variability in energy and protein content among BSG samples results in distinct fermentation profiles, which can influence animal performance and environmental outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of classifying BSG and incorporating precision formulation to mitigate adverse effects and maximize the benefits of this alternative feedstuff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207