Association of antidepressants with cataracts and glaucoma: a disproportionality analysis using the reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) pharmacovigilance database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are commonly prescribed for mood disorders. Epidemiological studies suggest antidepressant use may be associated with cataracts and glaucoma. We aim to investigate the association between antidepressants and cataracts and glaucoma. METHODS: ) were calculated for antidepressants (ie, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], serotonin-norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, serotonin modulators and stimulators, serotonin antagonists and reuptake inhibitors [SARIs], norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs], tetracyclic antidepressants [TeCAs], and monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOIs]). The reference agent was acetaminophen. RESULTS: TeCAs and MAOIs were significantly associated with a decreased risk of cataracts (ROR = 0.11-0.65 and 0.16-0.69, respectively). TCAs, brexanolone, esketamine, and opipramol reported an increased cataract risk (ROR = 1.31-12.81). For glaucoma, SSRIs, SNRIs, SARIs, TCAs, MAOIs, and other investigated antidepressants reported significant RORs ranging from 1.034 to 21.17. There was a nonsignificant association of angle closure glaucoma (ACG) and open angle glaucoma (OAG) with the investigated antidepressants. LIMITATIONS: For adverse event cases, multiple suspected product names are listed, and as cases are not routinely verified, there may be a possibility of duplicate reports and causality cannot be established. CONCLUSION: Most of the investigated antidepressants were associated with a lower risk of cataract reporting. TCAs, brexanolone, esketamine, and opipramol were associated with greater odds of cataract. For most antidepressants, there was an insignificant increase in reports of ACG and OAG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".