Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article s’intéresse aux produits étiquetés « Hildegarde de Bingen », en particulier, sur les sites marchands Les Jardins de saint Hildegarde, l’Institut Hildegardien et Hildegard Cosm dont la communication extérieure affirme que le Moyen Âge fait vendre. La réflexion interroge la façon dont la référence à Hildegarde et, par-delà, à une figure médiévale, peut être mise au service d’une quête de résilience, y compris et singulièrement, dans le domaine commercial. Elle met en avant les traits médiévaux favorisant la vente : la figure d’Hildegarde apparaît en phase avec certaines angoisses de notre époque, loin de l’ascétisme de la moniale, l’image commerciale d’Hildegarde est associée à des valeurs qui peuvent paraître superflues. De manière générale, l’intérêt pour le Moyen Âge permet une logique marketing inattendue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".