Okapi et Astrapi: précurseurs inattendus de la bande dessinée alternative ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structure majeure de la presse jeunesse catholique, Bayard incarne un volet plus progressiste et innovant que ses concurrents. Porté par un fort rapport à l’image, la structure tente, après 1968, de renouveler son offre avec des propositions plus modernes et tournées vers les élèves de fin d’élémentaire et de collège, dans la continuité de sa création Pomme d’Api. Okapi, créé en 1971, puis Astrapi, créé en 1978, occupent cet espace et proposent des contenus parfois inattendus pour ce type de presse, naviguant entre classicisme édifiant et innovations. Cet article propose d’étudier cet étrange mouvement à travers les bandes dessinées publiées qui, même après le départ de l’iconique fondateur d’Okapi Denys Prache, continuent de surprendre. Au sein de ces deux magazines, des bandes dessinées d’auteurs aux aspects très classiques (Pommaux, Desprès…) côtoient des futures figures de la bande dessinée d’auteur, de Nicole Claveloux à Émile Bravo, en passant par Yves Chaland ou Emmanuel Guibert, accompagnant ainsi certains virages de l’édition jeunesse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".