MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406091014 · doi:10.58931/cait.2024.4375

At-home Management of Food-induced Anaphylaxis

2024· article· en· W4406091014 on OpenAlexaff
Anne K. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian allergy & immunology today. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaphylaxisMedicineBusinessAllergyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially life-threatening, systemic reaction characterized by the involvement of two or more body systems. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (NIAID/FAAN) have well-established criteria for the clinical definition of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction that occurs suddenly after contact with an allergy-causing substance (e.g., peanuts), insect venom or medications (e.g., antibiotics). Anaphylaxis criteria include an acute onset of symptoms (within minutes to several hours) involving the skin, mucosal tissue, or both, which may present with generalized hives, pruritus or flushing, or swollen lips, tongue, and uvula. In addition, one or more of the following must be present: respiratory compromise, reduced blood pressure, or associated symptoms of end-organ dysfunction. Anaphylaxis results in a sudden release of mediators, including, but not limited to, histamine from activated mast cells and basophils following the cross-linking of specific immunoglobulin E. Together with downstream mediators, such as prostaglandin D2, platelet activating factor, and leukotrienes, this reaction manifests clinically through peripheral vasodilation, bronchoconstriction, and increased vascular permeability, presenting as a multi-organ emergency requiring immediate intervention. It is estimated that up to 5% of the population has experienced anaphylaxis, although fatality rates are very low at approximately 0.3% and occur most commonly with drug-induced anaphylaxis. Older age, often consistent with pre-existing comorbidities, and delayed epinephrine administration, pose the most significant risk factors for anaphylaxis fatality. While the global rates of anaphylaxis appear to be on the rise, case fatalities fortunately do not seem to follow this trend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian allergy & immunology today.Same topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207