MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406091021 · doi:10.58931/cibdt.2024.2333

S1PR Modulators in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: Considerations for Practice

2024· article· en· W4406091021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian IBD Today · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisColitisMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are novel oral small-molecule therapies that offer a unique profile compared to other advanced therapies in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), including oral administration, linear pharmacokinetic profiles, reduced immunogenicity, and lower costs associated with manufacturing. The activation of S1P G-protein coupled receptors plays an inflammatory role in UC by promoting lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs into circulation and colonic mucosa. S1PR modulators lead to internalization and degradation of these receptors, thereby reducing inflammation. Ozanimod was the first S1PR modulator approved for treating moderately-to-severely active UC and is also approved for multiple sclerosis. More recently, a second agent, etrasimod, was approved for UC. Etrasimod acts on different S1PR subtypes to avoid off target vascular and cardiac effects, has no up-titration regimen during initiation, a shorter half-life and less propensity for drug interactions. This review summarizes clinical trial and real-world data and provides guidance on the clinical uses of S1PR modulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it