GAN inversion and shifting: recommending product modifications to sellers for better user preference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In efforts to better accommodate users, numerous researchers have endeavored to model customer behavior, seeking to comprehend how they interact with diverse items within online platforms. This exploration has given rise to recommendation systems, which utilize customer similarity with other customers or customer-item interactions to suggest new items based on the existing item catalog. Since these systems primarily focus on enhancing customer experiences, they overlook providing insights to sellers that could help refine the aesthetics of their items and increase their customer coverage. In this study, we go beyond customer recommendations to propose a novel approach: suggesting aesthetic feedback to sellers in the form of refined item images informed by customer-item interactions learned by a recommender system from multiple consumers. These images could serve as guidance for sellers to adapt existing items to meet the dynamic preferences of multiple users simultaneously. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we design experiments showcasing how changing the number of consumers and the class of item image used affect the change in preference score. Through these experiments, we found that our methodology outperforms previous approaches by generating distinct, realistic images with user preference higher by 16.7%, thus bridging the gap between customer-centric recommendations and seller-oriented feedback.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".