Toward Optimized Federated Learning With Compressed Communications by Rate Adaption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is known that federated learning (FL) incurs heavy communication overhead for model training by exchanging model updates between clients and the parameter server (PS) over the Internet for multiple rounds. Compressing model updates is an effective approach to alleviating communication overhead in FL. Yet the tradeoff between compression and model accuracy in the networked environment remains unclear and, for simplicity, most implementations adopt a fixed compression rate only during the entire learning process. In this paper, we for the first time systematically examine this tradeoff, explicitly quantifying the relation between the compression error, the final model accuracy and the learning rate. Specifically, we factor the compression error of each global iteration into the convergence rate analysis under non-convex loss for both unbiased and biased compression algorithms. We then present an adaptation framework to maximize the final model accuracy by strategically adjusting the compression rate in each iteration. We further discuss key implementation issues of our framework in practical networks with classical compression algorithms. Experiments over the most representative MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets demonstrate that our solutions effectively shrink network traffic volume while maintain high model accuracy in FL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it