Toward Optimized Federated Learning With Compressed Communications by Rate Adaption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is known that federated learning (FL) incurs heavy communication overhead for model training by exchanging model updates between clients and the parameter server (PS) over the Internet for multiple rounds. Compressing model updates is an effective approach to alleviating communication overhead in FL. Yet the tradeoff between compression and model accuracy in the networked environment remains unclear and, for simplicity, most implementations adopt a fixed compression rate only during the entire learning process. In this paper, we for the first time systematically examine this tradeoff, explicitly quantifying the relation between the compression error, the final model accuracy and the learning rate. Specifically, we factor the compression error of each global iteration into the convergence rate analysis under non-convex loss for both unbiased and biased compression algorithms. We then present an adaptation framework to maximize the final model accuracy by strategically adjusting the compression rate in each iteration. We further discuss key implementation issues of our framework in practical networks with classical compression algorithms. Experiments over the most representative MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets demonstrate that our solutions effectively shrink network traffic volume while maintain high model accuracy in FL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".