MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406105412 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.124.048858

Recombinant Human Tissue Kallikrein-1 for Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke and Preventing Recurrence

2025· review· en· W4406105412 on OpenAlexafffund
Scott E. Kasner, Philip M. Bath, Michael D. Hill, John Volpi, Michael Giuffre, Lorianne K. Masuoka, David Wambeke, Paolo Madeddu

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchStroke AssociationBritish Heart FoundationNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineBradykininStroke (engine)RevascularizationVasodilationPerfusionBrain ischemiaKallikreinCardiologyAdverse effectInternal medicineAnimal studiesClinical trialIschemiaAnesthesiaReceptorMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novel strategies are needed for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke when revascularization therapies are not clinically appropriate or are unsuccessful. rKLK1 (recombinant human tissue kallikrein-1), a bradykinin-producing enzyme, offers a promising potential solution. In animal studies of acute stroke, there is a marked 36-fold increase in bradykinin B2 receptor on brain endothelial cells of the ischemic region. Due to this environment, rKLK1-generated bradykinin will exert a potent local vasodilation and increase brain perfusion via 3 synergistic signaling pathways downstream to the B2 receptor. Because of its preferential effect on ischemic tissue, systemic adverse effects such as hypotension are avoided with proper dosing. In addition, with initial vasodilation through recruitment of preexisting collaterals, rKLK1 promotes long-term benefit of brain perfusion by promoting new collateral formation. With an extended course of therapy for weeks after acute ischemic stroke, these multifaceted effects may also reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. A prior phase II trial demonstrated a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and recurrent strokes, particularly among patients who were not eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. A phase II/III trial has launched in this population, though opportunities for combination revascularization therapies deserve further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207