MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406105497 · doi:10.1080/10439463.2024.2447842

Policing child sexual exploitation and abuse cases: a qualitative PRIORITY study of the challenges faced by law enforcement officers in Germany, Portugal, and Sweden

2025· article· en· W4406105497 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicing & Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaw enforcementCriminologyLawChild sexual abusePolitical scienceQualitative researchEnforcementSexual abuseSociologyHuman factors and ergonomicsPoison controlMedicineSocial scienceMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to explore the primary challenges experienced by European law enforcement officers who deal daily with child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) investigations. We conducted 6 focus group discussions with 26 criminal investigators and managers from Germany (n = 9), Portugal (n = 9), and Sweden (n = 8). Data were collected as part of the PRIORITY project, whose wider goal is to decrease the occurrence of CSEA by providing anonymous online interventions to individuals concerned about their sexual urges towards children. We employed reflexive thematic analysis at the semantic level. By adopting the Barnahus model as a theoretical lens, we generated three recurring themes and 13 related sub-themes. These overarching themes encompassed a range of organisational barriers, investigative difficulties, and systemic shortcomings and were found to extend across national borders, exhibiting both similarities and context-specific variations across the three countries. We discuss our findings in relation to the most significant policy and practice implications, within the context of the Barnahus model implementation. Additionally, our findings lay the groundwork for five empirically based recommendations aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of future law enforcement responses and prevention efforts in regard to child sexual exploitation and abuse cases at a European level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it