Bibliographic record
Abstract
The idea of geoengineering, that is the act of deliberately engaging with the environment in order to reduce or stop some form of pending catastrophic change, can quite literally be taken off the Earth's surface and into space. An obvious example of this is the action of planetary defense, which seeks to identify and deflect those solar system objects (asteroids and comets) that might impact the Earth, thereby avoiding catastrophic climate change. In this chapter, we review the current situation with respect to identifying and classifying the threat from near-Earth objects, and describe the methods by which such encounters might be averted. We also consider the growing problem of space debris accumulation, revealing this as a looming catastrophe, threatening to severely curtail space exploration and future space commerce. Furthermore, on the premise that all industry-based civilizations (both terrestrial and extraterrestrial) are likely to leave some evidence of environmental disruption and/or their attempts at ameliorating such disruption, geoengineering can, in principle, be thought of as an important technosignature in the search for extraterrestrial life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".