MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The relevance of two-phase flow in the thermo-hydro-mechanical evolution of clay formations exposed to high temperatures by heat-emitting waste

2025· article· en· W4406107409 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Thermal Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesU.S. Department of EnergyNationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver AbfälleHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeNuclear Waste Management OrganizationCanadian Nuclear Safety CommissionBaltimore Gas and Electric Company
KeywordsRelevance (law)Materials sciencePhase (matter)Flow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringHeat flowWaste heatWaste managementEnvironmental scienceThermalGeologyMechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsChemistryHeat exchangerPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compare two-phase flow and Richards flow implementations in OpenGeoSys-6 to model the thermo-hydro-mechanical evolution of heat-emitting waste in clay stone formations. Our quasi-1D example is based on the material sequence and domain properties observed in the FE experiment at the Mt. Terri underground research lab in Switzerland. We examine the validity of the Richards assumption by comparing a thermo-hydro-mechanically (THM) coupled Richards model against two THM-coupled two-phase flow-based models, one where the gas pressure is constrained to atmospheric pressure, and one unconstrained model. The model comparison was conducted with saturation-dependent permeability models at temperatures up to ≈ 200 ∘ C. Additionally, we consider the impact of two different vapor diffusion models, a gas pressure–independent empirical relationship versus the original De Vries model, which becomes relevant if gas pressure buildup is significant. Our results show excellent agreement between the two models for maximum temperatures around 100 ∘ . Even at higher temperatures, above 150 ∘ C, we observe good agreement, which improves significantly with increasing distance from the heater. Even for the highest heat power where both approaches differ significantly in the high-temperature regions, acceptable agreement can be reached outside those regions, i.e. a couple of tens of centimeters away from the heater, but still in the bentonite barrier domain. This work builds confidence in the use of Richards-based approaches for modeling of the THM processes in nuclear waste repository, and contributes to a knowledge-driven model selection in the context of safety-relevant radioactive waste management. • Comparison between nonisothermal two-phase flow model and Richards’ based approach. • Particular focus on high temperatures, high saturations and vapor diffusion. • Good agreement over wide temperature ranges shown. • Study builds confidence in Richards-based models for safety-relevant applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it