MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406112123 · doi:10.1177/0272989x241308768

A Fast Nonparametric Sampling Method for Time to Event in Individual-Level Simulation Models

2025· article· en· W4406112123 on OpenAlexaff
David U. Garibay-Treviño, Hawre Jalal, Fernando Alarid‐Escudero

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Decision Making · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsNonparametric statisticsEvent (particle physics)Sampling (signal processing)Computer scienceStatisticsDiscrete event simulationEconometricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose. Individual-level simulation models often require sampling times to events; however, efficient parametric distributions for many processes may often not exist. For example, time to death from life tables cannot be accurately sampled from existing parametric distributions. We propose an efficient nonparametric method to sample times to events that does not require any parametric assumption on the hazards. Methods. We developed a nonparametric sampling (NPS) approach that simultaneously draws multiple time-to-event samples from a categorical distribution. This approach can be applied to univariate and multivariate processes. We discretize the entire period into equal-length time intervals and then derived the interval-specific probabilities. The times to events can then be used directly in individual-level simulation models. We compared the accuracy of our approach in sampling time-to-events from common parametric distributions, including exponential, gamma, and Gompertz. In addition, we evaluated the method’s performance in sampling age to death from US life tables and sampling times to events from parametric baseline hazards with time-dependent covariates. Results. The NPS method estimated similar expected times to events from 1 million draws for the 3 parametric distributions, 100,000 draws for the homogenous cohort, 200,000 draws from the heterogeneous cohort, and 1 million draws for the parametric distributions with time-varying covariates, all in less than 1 second. Conclusion. Our method produces accurate and computationally efficient samples for time to events from hazards without requiring parametric assumptions. Highlights The nonparametric sampling method is generic and can sample times to an event from any discrete (or discretizable) hazard without requiring any parametric assumption. The method is showcased with 5 commonly used distributions in discrete-event simulation models. The method produced very similar expected times to events, as well as their probability distribution, compared with analytical results. We provide a multivariate categorical sampling function for R and Python programming languages to sample times to events from processes with different hazards simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.278
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Decision MakingSame topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptationFrench-language works237,207