Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Large Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Self-efficacy in mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) prevention plays a pivotal role in promoting preventive behaviors by fostering a sense of control and motivation, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM), the population most affected by mpox in many countries. Objective: This study aims to assess the mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM in China and identify factors influencing it, using a validated mpox prevention self-efficacy scale. Methods: From October 2023 to March 2024, a nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted among MSM (aged ≥18 years) across 6 geographic regions in China using a snowball sampling method. The recruited participants (effective response rate=2403/2481, 96.9%) were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire designed based on prior knowledge of mpox and social cognitive theory. The mpox prevention self-efficacy scale was evaluated for construct validity using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and its reliability was assessed using the Cronbach α coefficient. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the factors associated with mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM. Results: A total of 2403 MSM participants were included, with a mean age of 29 (IQR 19-39) years. Of these, 1228 (51.1%) were aged 25-34 years, 1888 (78.6%) held a college degree or higher, and 2035 (84.7%) were unmarried. The median mpox prevention self-efficacy score was 23 (IQR 18-28). Exploratory factor analysis retained 6 items of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a strong model fit (χ²₅=32.1, n=1225; P<.001; comparative fit index=0.991; root mean square error of approximation=0.067; standardized root mean square residual=0.02; goodness-of-fit index=0.992; normed fit index=0.990; incremental fit index=0.991; Tucker-Lewis index=0.974), with all indices within acceptable ranges. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach α of 0.859. The positive factors associated with mpox prevention self-efficacy were mpox-related knowledge (OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.070-1.146), perceived risk awareness (OR 1.338, 95% CI 1.132-1.583), and mpox risk perception (OR 1.154, 95% CI 1.066-1.250), while the negative factor was age, with individuals aged 25 years and older exhibiting lower self-efficacy in mpox prevention (25-34 years: OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.642-0.970; 35-44 years: OR 0.572, 95% CI 0.444-0.736; 45 years and older: OR 0.569, 95% CI 0.394-0.823). Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical role of targeted interventions to enhance mpox prevention self-efficacy, particularly through increasing knowledge, perceived risk awareness, and risk perception. Such interventions are especially important for middle-aged and older MSM, who may experience a decline in self-efficacy. Strengthening self-efficacy in these areas is essential for promoting sustained preventive behaviors, improving mental well-being, and contributing to more effective mpox prevention and control within the MSM community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".