Enhancing Power System Transient Stability Using Static Var Compensator Based on a Fuzzy Logic Controller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Running power systems near their maximum operating limits can cause instability if a disturbance occurs.Conventional procedures can dampen the system's oscillations, such as speed and voltage regulation of generator units, or by using a flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) device.These devices are extensively utilized in power systems.In this paper, the transient stability of the power system has been enhanced by the proposed static var compensator (SVC) based on a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) compared with the conventional SVC based on a Proportional Integral (PI) controller.Six distinct categories of failures were examined.The proposed FLC responses were compared with the conventional PI controller regarding the difference in rotor angle between machines, the transmission line active power, synchronous machines speeds and terminal voltages variation, thyristor switched capacitor (TSC) response, reactive power, and thyristor controller reactor (TCR) response.MATLAB-Simulink evaluated the proposed SVC based on an FLC on a two-machine, 3-bus power system.The simulation result showed the superiority of the SVC based on an FLC over the conventional SVC based on a PI controller.The maximum overshoot improved by 11.94%, and the settling time improved by 9.47%.In addition, it is noted that the proposed FLC contributes to compensating about 16.2% of the system's equivalent kinetic energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".