MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406117283 · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ada652

Complete 3D photoelectron momentum vector reconstruction from time-position charged particle imaging

2025· article· en· W4406117283 on OpenAlexafffund
Aurelien Sanchez, E. Scott Goudreau, Andrey E. Boguslavskiy, Douglas J. Moffatt, Rune Lausten, Iain Wilkinson, Varun Makhija, Albert Stolow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMax Planck - University of Ottawa Centre for Extreme and Quantum PhotonicsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsSpectrometerPhysicsRecoilMicrochannel plate detectorDetectorCharged particleTime of flightImage resolutionOpticsComputational physicsAtomic physicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many charged particle imaging techniques exist which directly measure, at a detector, the transverse position (x, y) and time-of-flight (t) of individual events in order to obtain a full set of 3D coordinates. Where curved velocity-mapping electric field lines are implemented, as in the case of 3D Velocity Map Imaging (3D VMI) and certain COLTRIMS (Cold Target Recoil Ion Momentum Spectroscopy) instruments, the general transformation of (x, y, t)-data into initial 3D recoil momentum vectors (px , py , pz ) is challenging and has not yet been fully addressed. Here we present a detailed and general method for this transformation, illustrated using our 3D VMI spectrometer and the well-known narrow-band photoionization of nitric oxide, for which we demonstrate quantitative agreement with reported values. We additionally show how to measure and correct (i) small errors in the laser polarization axis alignment at the interaction region of a 3D charged particle imaging spectrometer, and (ii) the spatial variation of gain on a microchannel plate (MCP) detector. Improvements to and characterization of our 3D VMI spectrometer yield an electron time-of-flight resolution of 72 ps across the full 40 mm MCP, in combination with pixel-level spatial resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207