MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406117679 · doi:10.1177/10775463241312818

Adjustable vibration damper design for superconducting quarter wave resonators

2025· article· en· W4406117679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marco Balestri, Jacob A. Brown, Sang-Hoon Kim, Mohit Patil, Paolo Neri, Ting Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityOffice of ScienceMichigan State UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsDamperVibrationResonatorSuperconductivityStructural engineeringTuned mass damperQuarter (Canadian coin)Vibration controlPhysicsMaterials scienceEngineeringAcousticsElectrical engineeringCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detuning caused by ambient mechanical vibrations represents a significant challenge in superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, particularly in low β configurations. A solution to mitigate this problem within a cryogenic environment is a frictional damper, initially developed at Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare by A. Facco. This damper dissipates the kinetic energy of vibrations through friction. Its effectiveness is closely linked to the natural mode it aims to mitigate and the amplitude of ambient noise. Consequently, optimization is crucial for each cavity configuration. In this paper, three different optimization parameters are analyzed, and an easily configurable design of the damper is proposed. Experimental results aimed at optimizing the structural behavior of the cavity coupled with the damper are presented. Finite element analyses have been performed to model both the damping effect and the non-linear response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation DynamicsFrench-language works237,207