MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406118627 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570610

Early Terrain Identification for Mobile Robots Using Inertial Measurement Sensors and Machine Learning Techniques

2024· article· fr· W4406118627 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nilesh Bhosle, Arnav Malik, D. Shivakrishna, Jayant Jagtap, Shrikrishna Kolhar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Science Foundation
KeywordsTerrainIdentification (biology)Inertial measurement unitComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMobile robotRobotComputer visionHuman–computer interactionGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to rapid advancements in robotics technology, mobile robots are now utilized across various industries and applications.Understanding the terrain on which a robot operates can greatly aid its navigation and movement adjustments, ultimately minimizing potential hazards and ensuring seamless operation.This study aims to identify the specific terrain on which a mobile robot travel.Data was gathered using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) installed on the robot for experimental testing.The key contributions of this research are twofold: firstly, the implementation and evaluation of various machine learning techniques using the IMU sensor dataset, comparing their performance using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.Secondly, after assessing the different techniques, the most effective one is chosen for the final system implementation.Following the experimental evaluation of machine learning techniques, it was determined that the light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) classifier outperformed the others.Consequently, LGBM was utilized for the proposed system's implementation, achieving a 91% accuracy in surface classification.The experimental results highlight the efficiency and viability of the proposed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207