MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406119048 · doi:10.17234/croatica.68.6

Inzularnost i nemogućnost povratka – Novak, Mimica, Babaja

2024· article· hr· W4406119048 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tomislav Šakić

Bibliographic record

VenueCroatica časopis za hrvatski jezik književnost i kulturu · 2024
Typearticle
Languagehr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OxfordUniversity of ChicagoPrinceton University
KeywordsBusiness administrationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U prilogu se razmatra tematski kompleks tzv. inzularnosti – svojevrsne geste odustajanja od povijesti, razvijene u romanima "Izgubljeni zavičaj" (1954) i "Mirisi, zlato i tamjan" (1968) Slobodana Novaka – u modernističkoj hrvatskoj kinematografiji 1960-ih i 70-ih. Osim kasnijih adaptacija Novakovih djela u filmovima Ante Babaje "Mirisi, zlato i tamjan" (1971) i "Izgubljeni zavičaj" (1980) taj se kompleks na filmu prvi put uprizorio u filmu "Prometej s otoka Viševice" (1964) Vatroslava Mimice, priči o partizanu Mati Bakuli koja je filmski predočena kao rad sjećanja potaknut povratkom na rodni otok 20 godina nakon rata. Glavna je teza rada da Mimičin film nosi snažne motivske, tematske i strukturalne tragove lektire "Izgubljenog zavičaja". Figura razočaranog revolucionara pristigla je u hrvatski film upravo iz Novaka. Pitanje tretmana prostora i vremena u filmskoj priči i njezinu izlaganju kao presudno pitanje modernizma otvoreno je u hrvatskom modernističkom filmu upravo u onim igranim filmovima koji su, na fonu Novakovih djela, svoje filmske strukture uprizorili kao rad sjećanja i metaforu nemogućnosti povratka modernističkoga antijunaka u izgubljeni zavičaj.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCroatica časopis za hrvatski jezik književnost i kulturuSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207